Delayed But Deeper: A Field Trip to Orangutan Haven

A Journey Rescheduled  By Nature

The group stands proudly at the entrance of the soaring bamboo pavilion. This structure itself is a lesson—showing that sustainable materials can create breathtaking, modern forms.

Our field trip for the Architecture Study Program was originally scheduled for December 1, 2025. But nature had other plans. The catastrophic floods of late November – the same system failure I spoke about in my recent seminar – forced us to pause.

Today, December 22, we finally made the journey. And perhaps it was fitting. We went to learn about nature and bamboo construction exactly when the memory of nature’s power was freshest in our minds.

Alhamdulillah. Despite the obstacles, despite the rescheduling, despite the logistics, we are here. I came as the only lecturer, but I knew I wasn’t bringing them alone. The real expertise today would come from those who live and work with these principles daily.

Walking through the lush landscape of Orangutan Haven. For architecture students used to studio screens, this immersion in nature is a vital reset and inspiration.

Seeing the students out here, breathing fresh air instead of studio dust, I am reminded why we do this. Architecture is not learned solely in front of a screen. It is learned by touching the earth, feeling the material, and understanding the context we build in.

The Residents of The Haven

Orangutan Haven isn’t a zoo. It’s a sanctuary for those who cannot go back.

We started with a hike. The green landscape was a relief for eyes tired of concrete and screens. The team at Orangutan Haven guided us gently up the trail, pointing out plants, explaining the ecosystem. These aren’t park rangers following scripts – they are conservationists with deep knowledge and genuine passion.

The open-air amphitheater provides a space for reflection. Surrounded by the sounds of the forest, students process the stories of displacement and resilience they’ve just heard.

Sitting in the amphitheater, students listen to the tragic but important histories of residents like Leuser and Lewis. A sobering reminder of why we must design responsibly.

But the real lesson began when we sat down to hear the stories of the residents here.

Deknong. Fajrin. Lewis. Leuser. Dina. etc.

These aren’t just names; they are tragedies caused by human design – or lack of it.

The Orangutan Haven team explained each story with both scientific precision and emotional honesty. Leuser, blind because he was shot 62 times with an air rifle. Dina, paralyzed from illness as a baby. Lewis, blinded by shots from farmers protecting plantations.

They cannot be released into the wild. Because of us. Because our development patterns, our plantations, our encroachment left them no space.

I watched the students as they listened. The “fun” field trip vibe shifted to something deeper. You could see them processing it: *We are studying to be builders. Our designs will eat up land. Are we going to be part of the problem, or part of the solution?*

That moment – that pause – was worth the entire semester of theory. Because empathy is the foundation of sustainable design. You cannot design for nature if you do not feel for it.

And the Orangutan Haven team facilitated this perfectly. They didn’t preach. They just told the truth, and let the students feel it.

The Bamboo Workshop – From River To Structure

The second session shifted from “why” to “how.”

And here, the Orangutan Haven team truly shone. These are practitioners who work with bamboo daily – not as theory, but as lived practice. Having them teach our students was invaluable. It bridges the gap between my academic instruction and real-world sustainable construction.

Under the shade of bamboo groves, the Orangutan Haven team shares their deep knowledge of the ecosystem. Today, the forest is our lecture hall.

Students and Orangutan Haven team members gathered by the river—a perfect example of sustainable structure in harmony with nature.

We talk a lot about sustainability in class. But today, the students got their hands dirty with it. The bamboo workshop wasn’t just about tying knots; it was a full lifecycle lesson, taught by people who actually build with bamboo.

The team walked students through every step:

Selection: Not every bamboo is ready to build. They explained how to identify the right age, the right species. Betung (Dendrocalamus asper) for structural elements. Tali (Gigantochloa apus) for bindings and smaller components. They showed how to read the color, feel the density, assess readiness.

The bamboo workshop in full swing. Surrounded by the raw material, students listen intently as the Orangutan Haven team explains the nuances of selecting and preparing bamboo for construction.

Harvesting: There’s a right way to cut so the clump regenerates. Cut too young, you weaken the material. Cut too old, it’s brittle. Cut wrong, you kill the clump. The team demonstrated the traditional technique passed down through generations, but explained the science behind why it works.

Cleaning: Students helped strip branches, then took the culms to the river. The team explained why river washing matters – it’s not just removing dirt, it’s removing surface fungi and sap that would otherwise attract beetles and decay. Watching students in the river, laughing as they scrubbed bamboo, was pure joy.

From cleaning in the river to crafting joinery, today they didn’t just study sustainable materials—they built with them.

Preservation: This was the critical technical lesson, and the team was meticulous. How to pierce the nodes (membolongkan ruas) so the borax-boric acid solution can penetrate the entire culm. They explained the chemistry simply: borax prevents fungal growth, boric acid prevents insect infestation. Without this, bamboo lasts 3-5 years. With this, it can last 30+ years.

They demonstrated the technique, then supervised as students practiced. Patient corrections. Encouragement. This is teaching at its best – expert practitioners sharing knowledge generously.

Crafting: Then came the creative challenge. Students were asked to design and build signage using bamboo. The Orangutan Haven team provided tools, materials, and guidance – but let students figure out the problems themselves.

I saw frustration. “Why won’t this stay together?”

I saw problem-solving. “If we angle it this way…”

I saw collaboration. “Hold this while I cut this…”

And then I saw pride when their signage actually stood up.

The team celebrated each successful structure. Not patronizing praise, but genuine appreciation. “You did well. This bamboo cut will doing great.”

Pausing near the bamboo bridge. It’s not just a crossing; it’s a testament to engineering with natural materials—strong, flexible, and beautiful.

 

This field trip was about more than orangutans and bamboo. It was about “inception” – planting ideas that will grow over time.

 

When students return to studio, they will design buildings. Some will become architects choosing materials for hotels, schools, houses. Most will default to what they know: concrete, steel, glass.

But maybe – just maybe – today planted a seed.

Maybe when they’re specifying materials five years from now, they’ll remember the feel of bamboo in their hands. The weight of it. The way it split when they cut wrong, but held strong when they did it right.

Maybe they’ll remember Leuser’s sightless eyes and think twice about building on forested land.

Maybe they’ll remember how patient the Orangutan Haven team was – how these experts shared knowledge not to show off, but because they genuinely wanted the next generation to do better.

This is why I took them there. Not for fun (though we had that). Not for grades (though they’ll write reflections). But for this: to shift how they think about what it means to build.

Architecture education happens in many places. Lecture halls teach theory. Studios teach design process. But places like Orangutan Haven – with practitioners like this team – teach something deeper. They teach values.

And values shape every design decision for a lifetime.

As we loaded back onto the bus, exhausted and muddy, I felt grateful.

Grateful that despite floods and delays, this happened.

Grateful for the Orangutan Haven team, who shared their expertise so generously. They didn’t have to do this. They could have given us a standard tour. Instead, they gave students a transformative experience.

Grateful for students who showed up ready to learn. Who listened to tragic stories without cynicism. Who wrestled with bamboo without giving up. Who asked good questions.

And grateful for the reminder – which I needed as much as they did – that we are not separate from nature. We are part of it. Our buildings are part of it. Our design decisions affect it.

When Cyclone Senyar flooded Medan three weeks ago, it was because we forgot this. We designed as if water was an obstacle to eliminate, rather than a system to work with.

When orangutans lose their habitat, it’s because we designed plantations and cities as if forests were empty space waiting to be claimed.

But it doesn’t have to be this way.

We can design differently. With the land. With the rivers. With the forests. With the orangutans.

That’s the future I want my students to build.

And today, thanks to the Orangutan Haven team and the lessons they taught, I think we took one small step toward that future.

To my students: I hope you enjoyed the hike. I hope you had fun in the river. I hope you’re proud of the signage you built.

But mostly, I hope you remember this day when you’re making real decisions about real projects. When a client says “just use concrete,” remember bamboo. When a developer wants to clear forest, remember Leuser. When you’re tired and tempted to design the easy way, remember the Orangutan Haven team’s patience and passion.

To the Orangutan Haven team: Thank you. You taught my students things I cannot teach in a classroom. You showed them what it looks like to live your values. You gave them a gift.

Alhamdulillah for a safe journey. Alhamdulillah for good teachers. Alhamdulillah for students willing to learn.

Now, back to the studio. We have a lot of work to do.

But we’re going to do it a little differently now.

When A City Floods And You Realize Your Responsibility: Reflections From Today

Medan, December 12, 2025

Two Weeks After

I’m sitting at my desk, still in the clothes I wore to the seminar this morning. It’s evening now, and the adrenaline is fading. My voice is hoarse from speaking.

Two weeks ago, my city flooded. November 26-27, 2025. Cyclone Senyar. 85,000 people evacuated in one night. 514 identified flood points in Medan. 1,502 flood events recorded across Indonesia this year. 743+ deaths from Sumatra floods.

Today, I stood in front of a room full of educators and presented research about why this happened. About design failures. About system collapse. About professional responsibility.

This should feel disconnected – talking about theory while the city is still recovering. But it’s the opposite. Crisis is exactly when these conversations matter most.

Webinar Presentation in December 12, 2025

Why This Seminar Happened—Promoting Scientific Culture

E-flyer of Promoting Scientific Culture Webinar from LLDIKTI 1

LLDIKTI1 (the regional higher education authority for North Sumatra and Aceh) organized a seminar series called “Promoting Scientific Culture.” The basic question it asks is simple but fundamental: how do we make knowledge matter?

Not just produce knowledge. But ensure that research actually influences decisions. That academia connects to reality. That when universities study problems, that knowledge reaches people who can solve them.

This is urgent in our region. We face climate vulnerability, flooding, rapid urbanization, limited resources. We have universities with brilliant researchers. We have data, solutions, expertise. But the gap between what we know and what we do remains enormous.

LLDIKTI1 created this seminar series to try to close that gap. To bring educators from different disciplines and institutions together. To facilitate dialogue. To ask: how do we build a culture where knowledge is taken seriously?

That’s why this seminar mattered. Not just another presentation. But an intentional effort to strengthen how academia functions in this region.

Meeting Backround Promoting Scientific Culture Webinar

Universitas Medan Area As Host

Universitas Medan Area (UMA) was selected as the primary coordinator for this week’s seminar. That selection meant something.

LLDIKTI1 chose UMA. Which signals institutional recognition. That the university has something to contribute. That we’ve been building research infrastructure, encouraging faculty publication, creating systems that support scholarly work.

But more importantly, it’s a responsibility. Hosting a seminar isn’t trivial. It requires allocating resources, coordinating logistics, ensuring quality execution. UMA chose to invest in this. Which sends a message to faculty and students: knowledge that matters is important here. Research that connects to reality is valued here.

When I learned UMA was hosting, my first reaction was pride. Pride that my institution is being recognized at this level. My second reaction was responsibility: we must ensure this is well-executed. That it matters.

That context grounded me as I prepared my presentation. This wasn’t just my work. It was UMA’s commitment being tested. The institution’s values being put on display.

The Presentation I Gave

I began with condolences. Not as academic preamble. But as genuine acknowledgment. People in that room come from places hit by floods, landslides, disasters in recent weeks. Some lost family. Some lost homes. And I was about to talk about design theory.

I started with numbers: 85,000 evacuated. 514 flood points. 1,502 events this year. 743+ deaths.

Then I said the thing that can’t be unsaid: “This is not a weather event. This is a system failure.”

Because it’s true. If this were just weather, there’s nothing to blame ourselves for. But if it’s a system failure, then we – planners, architects, engineers, policymakers –  we have responsibility.

I presented four reasons Medan floods so catastrophically:

  • Impermeable surfaces. Concrete and asphalt prevent natural infiltration. Every square meter covered in hard surface is a square meter that no longer absorbs water.
  • Rapid urbanization. Growth without hydrological planning. We expand cities faster than we update water management systems.
  • Centralized systems. All drainage feeds into a few main channels. When those channels fail, everything fails at once.
  • Climate change. Intensifying consequences of all the above.

These are choices. Every concrete surface is a choice. Every drainage system is a choice.

Then I showed the shift: from Resistance (fighting water) to Resilience (tolerating, adapting, recovering). Like trees – rigid ones break in the wind, flexible ones dance with it.

I presented solutions at three scales:

  • City Scale: Policy and planning. Semarang’s 40% complete flood control project integrating green infrastructure.
  • Neighborhood Scale: Green infrastructure. Rain gardens and bioswales designed with 2-3x normal capacity for extreme events. Permeable paving. Water squares. Tebet Eco Park in Jakarta is a real example.
  • Building Scale: Elevation—raising main floors above flood lines. Amphibious design. Water-resistant materials. Each building becomes a resilience unit.

Real proof: Brisbane – 91% resilience in retrofitted homes, 70% insurance premium drop. Rotterdam – Water Squares that are beautiful public spaces and stormwater management. Semarang – doing this now in our region.

The One Question That Changed Everything

After I finished, there was one question.

Just one.

Someone asked: “Should our design standards be based on data about rainfall? How do we calibrate our designs to handle extreme events?”

This was the exact question that mattered. Not about theory. But about practical standards. Implementation. How do we actually build this?

And that question opened something crucial.

I answered by connecting it directly to Cyclone Senyar. November 26-27. What just happened to our city.

The real question is: do our design standards assume cyclones like Senyar won’t happen again? Or do we design assuming they will?

They will happen again. Maybe not next year. But again. And if we haven’t changed, we’ll face the same disaster.

Elevation becomes critical. Buildings with elevated main floors – not as luxury, but as standard – would have fared differently. Critical systems wouldn’t have been submerged. Displacement would have been reduced.

For green infrastructure, capacity must be designed for 2-3 times normal conditions during extreme events. A bioswale holding 100mm won’t help when 300mm falls. Design it for 200-300mm. Yes, it’s overkill in normal years. But in cyclone years, it’s the difference between managing a crisis and experiencing a disaster.

This is design becoming precautionary. Not reactive. Not “what if.” But “when.”

That one question opened something. We must design knowing that extreme events will happen again. And we must design so that when they do, impact is manageable, not catastrophic.

The conversation could have continued. More people could have asked. Dialogue could have deepened. But it ended there. One question. Answered. But not built upon.

And I felt something: disappointment mixed with recognition that quality matters more than quantity. One person thinking critically about design standards is worth more than a room passively receiving information.

Going Forward – For My Students And My Community

As I reflect on today, I’m clear about what must happen next.

For my students:

When I return to teaching, every studio project will start with hydrological analysis. Not as optional content. Not as afterthought. As foundation.

Every design will begin: “Where does water go? How do we design for that?”

Because my students will make decisions that affect real people. Some will design buildings. Some will work for developers. Some will enter government planning. Every choice they make – where to place systems, what materials to use, whether to think about water – will have consequences.

I need them to understand that designing is a form of power. The power to create resilience or vulnerability. The power to help people survive cyclones or to increase their suffering.

For my community:

I need to stop pretending that research alone is enough. Knowledge existing in university papers and presentations while the city outside keeps flooding – that’s not acceptable.

I need to find more ways to make my work matter practically. To connect with planners and developers. To ensure that what I learn is actually used in decision-making. To push for policy change based on evidence.

Concrete standards that must change:

Design standards must assume extreme events will recur. Not “might happen.” But will. Cyclones like Senyar. Rainfall like November 26-27. We design for those, not average conditions.

Infrastructure capacity must exceed by 2-3x in extreme weather zones. Not just prudent. It’s what works, based on what we just experienced.

Elevation is not luxury. It’s necessity in flood-prone, cyclone-vulnerable areas. Standard practice, not exception.

The culture question:

I also can’t ignore what happened in that room. Limited engagement. One question. Limited discussion.

From a room full of educators – people who shape how students think – the engagement was limited. And that concerns me deeply.

If educators don’t model critical thinking, don’t demonstrate good questioning, what culture of inquiry are we building? How do we expect our students to ask hard questions if we don’t?

This is exactly what “promoting scientific culture” should address. But it didn’t happen. And that’s a problem we need to name and address.

The Commitment

Two weeks after Cyclone Senyar devastated Medan, I stood in a room and presented research about why cities flood. I talked about design failures and professional responsibility. I answered one good question from someone thinking practically about implementation.

I didn’t inspire a room full of engaged scholars. But I did something else: I modeled what responsibility looks like. To speak about hard things. To connect research to reality. To answer practical questions with concrete strategies.

Now I need to carry that forward. In how I teach. In how I engage with my community. In how I push for change.

The gap between knowing and doing is immense. But it’s filled by choices. People deciding to speak or stay silent. Educators deciding to model critical thinking or accept passive participation. Professionals deciding to advocate for change or accept status quo.

I choose to speak. I choose to make my work matter. I choose to help my students and my community understand that design choices have real consequences.

That’s my work now. Not just presenting. But helping to shift the culture of how we engage with knowledge, with responsibility, with the future we’re designing.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

 

 

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab